請在用廣東移動的朋友說說安裝經驗

2016-12-28 19:59:36 +08:00
 kennylam777
坐標中山市。

早前小區終於有移動的 FTTH ,因為不滿意電信光寬帶的海外速度,對國內網站也沒有需求,這裡的廣電寬帶送了 4M 移動,試香港都經常滿速,所以申請了多一根移動光纖的來玩玩。

申請安裝了,錢也付了,本應是 3 個工作天會有人聯絡約上門安裝都沒有反應,撥上去 10086 還是一直說今天回應,結果都一直沒回應......

廣東移動光寬帶都是這麼難安裝嗎?
5054 次点击
所在节点    宽带症候群
31 条回复
halczy
2016-12-29 23:14:52 +08:00
楼主确定小区线路已经安装完成?我在广州某小区是开通前提前一个月有销售宣传并收钱。小区线路开通当天就有人来装。

不过广东移动可能最近家庭宽带发展比较迅速,夜晚已经有明显堵塞现象。 PCCW 直连线路,电信夜晚会比移动更加稳定。

广州移动 -> PCCW


广州电信 <-> PCCW

kennylam777
2016-12-30 00:38:27 +08:00
@Guladong
@fchypzero 你們的上行速度有多少?
fchypzero
2016-12-30 08:51:20 +08:00
@kennylam777 上行是下行的一半
Guladong
2016-12-30 09:14:03 +08:00
@kennylam777 现在我没在中山了
kennylam777
2016-12-31 18:59:41 +08:00
@fchypzero 今天安裝了, 的確是這樣, Speedtest.net 的深圳 CMCC 測速點是 94 下 58 上, 很滿意了。
@halczy 我的反而是電信 ping 不行, 移動還好好的, SS 輕鬆跑上 80Mbps

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
中山移動 -> PCCW (家用 Netvigator 500Mbps 對等)

traceroute to xxxx, 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 172.28.0.1 (172.28.0.1) 2.047 ms 175.603 ms 97.733 ms
2 183.233.43.57 (183.233.43.57) 7.037 ms 183.233.43.61 (183.233.43.61) 4.706 ms 3.502 ms
3 211.136.210.17 (211.136.210.17) 6.972 ms * 211.136.210.21 (211.136.210.21) 8.066 ms
4 221.183.27.1 (221.183.27.1) 7.309 ms 221.183.13.69 (221.183.13.69) 4.716 ms 221.183.13.65 (221.183.13.65) 5.082 ms
5 221.176.22.162 (221.176.22.162) 9.285 ms 221.176.22.110 (221.176.22.110) 127.015 ms 221.176.22.162 (221.176.22.162) 29.956 ms
6 221.176.24.150 (221.176.24.150) 14.611 ms 221.176.24.146 (221.176.24.146) 10.307 ms 221.176.24.238 (221.176.24.238) 14.174 ms
7 211.136.1.101 (211.136.1.101) 23.729 ms 24.999 ms 26.436 ms
8 63-218-211-29.static.pccwglobal.net (63.218.211.29) 58.274 ms 35.617 ms 47.690 ms
9 hsbc.ge9-15.br01.hkg05.pccwbtn.net (63.218.145.158) 51.329 ms 42.087 ms 44.786 ms
10 wtsc3a057.netvigator.com (218.102.40.57) 29.844 ms 29.389 ms wtsc3a053.netvigator.com (218.102.40.53) 24.231 ms
11 *

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
中山電信 -> PCCW (家用 Netvigator 500Mbps 對等)

traceroute to xxxx, 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 183.32.60.1 (183.32.60.1) 6.166 ms 2.163 ms 3.725 ms
2 14.18.0.53 (14.18.0.53) 4.456 ms 5.240 ms 3.514 ms
3 183.58.11.57 (183.58.11.57) 7.364 ms 7.620 ms 7.586 ms
4 183.58.10.157 (183.58.10.157) 9.143 ms 8.032 ms 7.789 ms
5 * 202.97.35.202 (202.97.35.202) 7.863 ms *
6 * 202.97.60.206 (202.97.60.206) 14.070 ms 202.97.60.82 (202.97.60.82) 12.741 ms
7 202.97.60.242 (202.97.60.242) 162.037 ms 202.97.51.98 (202.97.51.98) 153.434 ms 202.97.50.94 (202.97.50.94) 176.980 ms
8 202.97.50.22 (202.97.50.22) 184.121 ms 202.97.50.54 (202.97.50.54) 170.357 ms 202.97.90.114 (202.97.90.114) 171.614 ms
9 63-218-212-85.static.pccwglobal.net (63.218.212.85) 158.368 ms 156.311 ms 157.534 ms
10 TenGE0-0-0-4.br05.hkg05.pccwbtn.net (63.223.31.58) 210.989 ms 210.948 ms 222.831 ms
11 hsbc.ge9-15.br01.hkg05.pccwbtn.net (63.218.145.158) 214.370 ms 209.028 ms 229.688 ms
12 wtsc3a057.netvigator.com (218.102.40.57) 219.981 ms wtsc3a045.netvigator.com (218.102.40.45) 225.212 ms wtsc3a057.netvigator.com (218.102.40.57) 216.455 ms
13 *
kennylam777
2016-12-31 19:05:43 +08:00
不說 SS, 直接跑 iperf3, 廣東移動到 PCCW 比電信還是快很多, 今天星期六 7:00pm 高峰期的測試, PCCW 一方已經上了 TCP-BBR

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
中山移動 -> PCCW (家用 Netvigator 500Mbps 對等)


Connecting to host xxxx, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host xxxx is sending
[ 4] local 172.28.xx.xx port 43229 connected to 219.79.xxx.xxx port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.41 sec 4.25 MBytes 25.3 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.41-2.08 sec 5.25 MBytes 65.5 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.08-3.01 sec 9.00 MBytes 81.1 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.01-4.03 sec 9.62 MBytes 79.5 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.03-5.01 sec 9.00 MBytes 76.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.01-6.04 sec 9.00 MBytes 73.6 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.04-7.03 sec 8.62 MBytes 72.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.03-8.01 sec 9.38 MBytes 80.1 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.01-9.00 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.04 sec 11.0 MBytes 89.3 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.04 sec 89.4 MBytes 74.8 Mbits/sec 11626 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.04 sec 86.8 MBytes 72.5 Mbits/sec receiver


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
中山電信 -> PCCW (家用 Netvigator 500Mbps 對等)


Connecting to host xxxx, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host xxxx is sending
[ 4] local 183.32.xx.xx port 33007 connected to 219.79.xxx.xxx port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.56 sec 384 KBytes 2.02 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.56-2.24 sec 384 KBytes 4.62 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.24-3.19 sec 768 KBytes 6.61 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.19-4.26 sec 1.25 MBytes 9.76 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.26-5.22 sec 1.12 MBytes 9.89 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.22-6.09 sec 1.62 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.09-7.45 sec 1.50 MBytes 9.26 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.45-8.16 sec 1.38 MBytes 16.3 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.16-9.16 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.16-10.36 sec 1.38 MBytes 9.60 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.36 sec 14.7 MBytes 11.9 Mbits/sec 1695 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.36 sec 13.1 MBytes 10.6 Mbits/sec receiver

電信沒 BBR 的話, 1Mbps 也沒有。
mandymak
2017-01-02 17:00:52 +08:00
@kennylam777 刚刚找了 1 家 3 线的 VPS 试,联通和移动连 Netvigator 都不怎么样,还是 cn2 快。
akw2312
2017-01-02 18:13:54 +08:00
@kennylam777 那個深圳 cmcc 點可是個電信 ip 哦
只有移動過去會強行靜態路由過去
非移動過去都是電信..很奇葩的點

然後 cmcc..和 flagtel 的 peer 應該比較空曠
ntt pccw 都在塞 ntt 只有 10G 吃了一堆全球流量..
走 hkix 交換更慘 永遠速度上不去
mandymak
2017-01-02 18:32:10 +08:00
@akw2312 同感。
akw2312
2017-01-02 19:02:04 +08:00
@kennylam777 能幫忙測試下到台灣的路由和速度麼
59.115.212.x
kennylam777
2017-01-05 17:22:02 +08:00
@akw2312 只有 PCCW 的,移動那地點不是經常測到

Target Name: 59-115-212-1.dynamic.hinet.net
IP: 59.115.212.1
Date/Time: 5/1/17 5:21:18 PM

1 2 ms N/A N/A 5 ms 2 ms [10.193.231.206]
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 3 ms [10.193.230.213]
3 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms wtsc3a074.netvigator.com [218.102.40.74]
4 3 ms 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 3 ms 63-218-2-13.static.pccwglobal.net [63.218.2.13]
5 26 ms 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms pos2-1.cr02.hkg05.pccwbtn.net [63.218.215.113]
6 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms 23 ms tedata.pos2-1.cr02.hkg05.pccwbtn.net [63.218.215.114]
7 24 ms 26 ms 24 ms 25 ms 24 ms r4103-s2.tp.hinet.net [220.128.3.146]
8 25 ms 25 ms 26 ms 25 ms 26 ms 220-128-13-14.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.128.13.14]
9 33 ms 32 ms 34 ms 36 ms 31 ms r4101-s2.tp.hinet.net [220.128.7.210]
10 25 ms 25 ms 24 ms 34 ms 24 ms pcpc-3201.hinet.net [220.128.1.125]
11 N/A N/A N/A 25 ms 24 ms PCPC-3302.hinet.net [220.128.11.101]
12 24 ms 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms [168.95.23.93]
13 * * * * N/A [-]
14 * * * * N/A [-]
15 * * * * N/A [-]
16 * * * * N/A [-]
17 * * * * N/A [-]
18 * * * * N/A [-]
19 * * * * N/A [-]
20 * * * * N/A [-]
21 * * * * N/A [-]
22 * * * * N/A [-]
23 * * * * N/A [-]
24 * * * * N/A [-]
25 * * * * N/A [-]
26 * * * * N/A [-]

Destination not reached in 35 hops

这是一个专为移动设备优化的页面(即为了让你能够在 Google 搜索结果里秒开这个页面),如果你希望参与 V2EX 社区的讨论,你可以继续到 V2EX 上打开本讨论主题的完整版本。

https://www.v2ex.com/t/330835

V2EX 是创意工作者们的社区,是一个分享自己正在做的有趣事物、交流想法,可以遇见新朋友甚至新机会的地方。

V2EX is a community of developers, designers and creative people.

© 2021 V2EX