不在天朝的各位同学麻烦帮忙测试下访问速度，谢谢

V2EX = way to explore

V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方

现在注册

已注册用户请登录

O'Reilly Velocity

Web Performance and Operations

› http://velocityconf.com/

YSlow

› Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site

这是一个创建于 3952 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。

我们现在项目用的阿里云的服务，DNS用的dnspod，图片用的又拍云。
很多东南亚的用户在使用我们的APP时（有http接口调用）总是出现网络问题（估计是丢包），所以想邀请各位不在天朝的同学收集下数据。

麻烦大家把一下三个结果发上来吧。谢谢各位了。

A、ping www.tukeji.com
B、ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com
C、ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net

第 1 条附言 · 2013-07-06 13:37:40 +08:00

大家顺便多ping两个吧。
D：ping up.qiniudn.com
E：ping ns67.domaincontrol.com

ping

tukeji

dnspod

31 条回复 • 1970-01-01 08:00:00 +08:00

Livid

MOD

2013-07-06 10:55:14 +08:00

确实不算快。测试结果来自洛杉矶。

merryfreespace

2013-07-06 11:00:12 +08:00

C:\>ping www.tukeji.com

正在 Ping www.tukeji.com [42.121.132.183] 具有 32 字节的数据:
请求超时。
来自 42.121.132.183 的回复: 字节=32 时间=358ms TTL=44
来自 42.121.132.183 的回复: 字节=32 时间=539ms TTL=44
来自 42.121.132.183 的回复: 字节=32 时间=352ms TTL=43

42.121.132.183 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 3，丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 352ms，最长 = 539ms，平均 = 416ms

C:\>ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com

正在 Ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com [119.145.147.56] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 119.145.147.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=519ms TTL=44
来自 119.145.147.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=360ms TTL=44
来自 119.145.147.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=355ms TTL=44
来自 119.145.147.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=361ms TTL=44

119.145.147.56 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 355ms，最长 = 519ms，平均 = 398ms

C:\>ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net

正在 Ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net [119.167.195.12] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 119.167.195.12 的回复: 字节=32 时间=286ms TTL=46
来自 119.167.195.12 的回复: 字节=32 时间=280ms TTL=46
来自 119.167.195.12 的回复: 字节=32 时间=280ms TTL=46
来自 119.167.195.12 的回复: 字节=32 时间=294ms TTL=46

119.167.195.12 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 280ms，最长 = 294ms，平均 = 285ms

pala

2013-07-06 11:01:14 +08:00

美东，宾州

~ ❯❯❯ ping www.tukeji.com
PING www.tukeji.com (42.121.132.183): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=0 ttl=41 time=331.294 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=318.039 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=2 ttl=41 time=341.690 ms
^C
--- www.tukeji.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 318.039/330.341/341.690/9.679 ms
~ ❯❯❯ ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com
PING tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com (122.225.29.168): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 122.225.29.168: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=461.922 ms
64 bytes from 122.225.29.168: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=381.788 ms
64 bytes from 122.225.29.168: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=405.449 ms
64 bytes from 122.225.29.168: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=371.700 ms
^C
--- tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 371.700/405.215/461.922/34.956 ms
~ ❯❯❯ ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
PING f1g1ns1.dnspod.net (183.60.52.217): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=278.604 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=281.590 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=281.493 ms
^C
--- f1g1ns1.dnspod.net ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 278.604/280.562/281.590/1.385 ms

TerranC

2013-07-06 11:08:45 +08:00

谢谢各位的数据
@pala 看来dnspod这个存在丢包率比较高的问题

Perry

2013-07-06 11:10:03 +08:00

我的是不是来晚了。。Durham, NC

TerranC

2013-07-06 11:15:39 +08:00

@Perry 不嫌多，呵呵

TerranC

2013-07-06 11:16:33 +08:00

顺便问问有什么比较好的域名解析DNS推荐啊？免费的

juicy

2013-07-06 11:22:04 +08:00

ping www.tukeji.com
PING tukeji.com (184.168.221.40) 56(84) bytes of data.

....为什么ip是这个

thinkxen

2013-07-06 11:25:36 +08:00 via Android

上一台香港的节点吧

TerranC

2013-07-06 11:30:49 +08:00

@juicy 我换了godaddy自带的dns，还没生效吧，稍微等等

TerranC

2013-07-06 11:39:45 +08:00

@thinkxen 是说CDN还是？那如何解决写操作的丢包？其实网速不是太大问题，国外3G访问慢一点点也能接受，关键还是丢包，导致上传的东西总是失败。

tzheng

2013-07-06 12:25:46 +08:00

美中密苏里

noname-d8a25e937882:~ tian$ ping www.tukeji.com
PING tukeji.com (42.121.132.183): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
^C
--- tukeji.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
noname-d8a25e937882:~ tian$ ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com
PING tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com (112.90.179.66): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
^C
--- tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
noname-d8a25e937882:~ tian$ ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
PING f1g1ns1.dnspod.net (119.167.195.12): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
^C
--- f1g1ns1.dnspod.net ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss

TerranC

2013-07-06 12:36:27 +08:00

@tzheng ！！！！！确认上了网么？ping个baidu来看看，这结果不敢相信！

tzheng

2013-07-06 12:52:50 +08:00

@TerranC 我的错。。。我发现ping百度也不对。。应该是这会儿在的局域网封ping了

连了一个东北密苏里的vpn重ping:
vh220006:~ tian$ ping www.tukeji.com
PING tukeji.com (42.121.132.183): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=0 ttl=43 time=370.641 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=303.126 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=2 ttl=43 time=352.957 ms
^C
--- tukeji.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 303.126/342.241/370.641/28.585 ms
vh220006:~ tian$ ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com
PING tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com (112.90.179.66): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 112.90.179.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=300.464 ms
64 bytes from 112.90.179.66: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=447.943 ms
64 bytes from 112.90.179.66: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=387.071 ms
^C
--- tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 300.464/378.493/447.943/60.513 ms
vh220006:~ tian$ ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
PING f1g1ns1.dnspod.net (119.167.195.12): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=255.702 ms
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=253.360 ms
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=253.392 ms
^C
--- f1g1ns1.dnspod.net ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 253.360/254.151/255.702/1.097 ms

pianai

2013-07-06 13:00:08 +08:00

LasVegas

root@pianai:~# ping www.tukeji.com
PING tukeji.com (42.121.132.183) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_req=1 ttl=46 time=210 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_req=2 ttl=46 time=294 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_req=3 ttl=46 time=207 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_req=4 ttl=46 time=203 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_req=5 ttl=46 time=201 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_req=6 ttl=46 time=207 ms
^C
--- tukeji.com ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14% packet loss, time 6000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.901/220.731/294.131/32.946 ms
root@pianai:~# ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com
PING tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com (182.118.38.200) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=2 ttl=51 time=222 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=221 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=4 ttl=51 time=224 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=5 ttl=51 time=221 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=6 ttl=51 time=227 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=7 ttl=51 time=235 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=8 ttl=51 time=292 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=9 ttl=51 time=248 ms
64 bytes from hn.kd.ny.adsl (182.118.38.200): icmp_req=10 ttl=51 time=245 ms
^C
--- tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 8999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 221.207/237.768/292.889/21.824 ms
root@pianai:~# ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
PING f1g1ns1.dnspod.net (183.60.52.217) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_req=1 ttl=49 time=177 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_req=2 ttl=49 time=177 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_req=3 ttl=49 time=177 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_req=4 ttl=49 time=178 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_req=5 ttl=49 time=177 ms
64 bytes from 183.60.52.217: icmp_req=6 ttl=49 time=177 ms
^C
--- f1g1ns1.dnspod.net ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 177.846/177.955/178.050/0.350 ms

lanbing

2013-07-06 13:14:42 +08:00

服务器放香港或者韩国吧,阿里云出去太不给力.
DNS用POWERDNS,稳定.国内外都能访问.
云存储可以考虑加上CDN.

TerranC

2013-07-06 13:25:46 +08:00

@lanbing 恩，正在考虑，有推荐的服务器提供商否

zorceta

2013-07-06 13:29:51 +08:00

@TerranC dns.he.net

sharpnk

2013-07-06 22:58:14 +08:00

PING tukeji.com (42.121.132.183): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=409.540 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=408.507 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=318.394 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=319.713 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=408.914 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=318.423 ms
64 bytes from 42.121.132.183: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=319.718 ms
^C
--- tukeji.com ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 12.5% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 318.394/357.601/409.540/44.505 ms

PING tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com (122.136.32.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 122.136.32.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=329.204 ms
64 bytes from 122.136.32.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=304.686 ms
64 bytes from 122.136.32.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=323.011 ms
64 bytes from 122.136.32.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=325.712 ms
^C
--- tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 304.686/320.653/329.204/9.477 ms

PING f1g1ns1.dnspod.net (119.167.195.12): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=280.134 ms
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=302.359 ms
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=283.827 ms
64 bytes from 119.167.195.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=293.669 ms
^C
--- f1g1ns1.dnspod.net ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 280.134/289.997/302.359/8.684 ms

PING opt.xdwscache.glb0.lxdns.com (183.136.156.182): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 183.136.156.182: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=373.764 ms
64 bytes from 183.136.156.182: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=374.498 ms
64 bytes from 183.136.156.182: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=373.889 ms
^C
--- opt.xdwscache.glb0.lxdns.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 373.764/374.050/374.498/0.321 ms

PING ns67.domaincontrol.com (216.69.185.44): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 216.69.185.44: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=85.913 ms
64 bytes from 216.69.185.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=86.515 ms
64 bytes from 216.69.185.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=86.532 ms
64 bytes from 216.69.185.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=85.159 ms
^C
--- ns67.domaincontrol.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 85.159/86.030/86.532/0.561 ms

opendns@Halifax, Canada

wzzyj8

2013-07-06 23:41:37 +08:00

猜测你需要
http://just-dnslookup.com/index.php?vh=www.tukeji.com&c=&s=dns+lookup%21
和
http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=www.tukeji.com&c=&s=ping%21
package loss的确略高，DNS服务器目前看来问题不是很大，考虑CDN吧

Showfom

2013-07-07 02:51:46 +08:00

阿里云的出口带宽和普通的上海电信之类的都差不多

要是国外的访客多的话，别用天朝的云服务或VPS或者服务器或者CDN等任意产品，因为整个中国电信和中国联通的出口带宽就那么屁大点。

andyhu

2013-07-07 16:14:40 +08:00

@pianai 连vpn的同学都不靠谱，在vpn线路上ping相当于加上了自己电脑到vpn服务器的时间，要不是自己在国外，也只能ssh连上再ping，否则结果不准确

andyhu

2013-07-07 16:15:16 +08:00

建议楼主不要在v2上问了吧，可以去www.17ce.com测试下，有很多国外的节点

Livid

MOD

2013-07-07 16:20:40 +08:00

@andyhu 测试网站上多半是骨干节点，而最终用户可以测试到真实的 last mile 性能。

pianai

2013-07-07 22:32:44 +08:00

@andyhu ssh 登陆vps ping的数据没用用vpn

loveminds

2013-07-08 00:13:15 +08:00

@TerranC DNSPOD有国际版

@andyhu 国外比17ce好用的测试站多得是

andyhu

2013-07-09 09:31:14 +08:00

@loveminds 可否推荐几个？

donald

2013-07-09 09:42:13 +08:00

美东，verizon fios

C:\Windows\system32>ping www.tukeji.com

Pinging tukeji.com [42.121.132.183] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 42.121.132.183: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=246
Reply from 42.121.132.183: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=246
Reply from 42.121.132.183: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=246
Reply from 42.121.132.183: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 42.121.132.183:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 280ms, Maximum = 286ms, Average = 282ms

C:\Windows\system32>ping tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com

Pinging tukeji-upload.b0.upaiyun.com [119.145.147.56] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 119.145.147.56: bytes=32 time=589ms TTL=247
Reply from 119.145.147.56: bytes=32 time=565ms TTL=247
Reply from 119.145.147.56: bytes=32 time=571ms TTL=247
Reply from 119.145.147.56: bytes=32 time=588ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 119.145.147.56:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 565ms, Maximum = 589ms, Average = 578ms

C:\Windows\system32>ping f1g1ns1.dnspod.net

Pinging f1g1ns1.dnspod.net [183.60.52.217] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 183.60.52.217: bytes=32 time=566ms TTL=247
Reply from 183.60.52.217: bytes=32 time=573ms TTL=247
Reply from 183.60.52.217: bytes=32 time=590ms TTL=247
Reply from 183.60.52.217: bytes=32 time=544ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 183.60.52.217:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 544ms, Maximum = 590ms, Average = 568ms

C:\Windows\system32>ping up.qiniudn.com

Pinging opt.xdwscache.glb0.lxdns.com [218.92.227.120] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 218.92.227.120: bytes=32 time=419ms TTL=246
Reply from 218.92.227.120: bytes=32 time=415ms TTL=246
Reply from 218.92.227.120: bytes=32 time=414ms TTL=246
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 218.92.227.120:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 414ms, Maximum = 419ms, Average = 416ms

C:\Windows\system32>ping ns67.domaincontrol.com

Pinging ns67.domaincontrol.com [216.69.185.44] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.69.185.44: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=247
Reply from 216.69.185.44: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=247
Reply from 216.69.185.44: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=247
Reply from 216.69.185.44: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 216.69.185.44:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 194ms, Maximum = 196ms, Average = 195ms

zava

2013-07-09 09:48:14 +08:00

@Showfom 没错。

TerranC

2013-07-11 19:57:08 +08:00

@andyhu 谢谢
@Livid 谢谢提醒
@loveminds 好奇DNSPOD的付费用户是不是就没这个问题？

loveminds

2013-07-11 22:12:57 +08:00

@TerranC 相对来说国外用户用国际版更加适宜